Critical book review

Today, a huge number of critics and those who want to express their views, and others to listen to him. A review of a book, a sample of which can be found in any textbook, is actually not as simple as it might seem. Therefore, not every writer, reader or journalist has sufficient analytical mind and critical eye to optimally and correctly write unbiased reviews.

About how to write a correct review of the book can not be read or learned, because many critics just received a good philological education, which allows you to determine the grade and quality of the work. A bad review is primarily distinguished by the dominance of one’s own opinion, the definitions are bad and a good book, little argumentation and lack of critical view, accurate conclusions. At the same time, the text is more like a school essay or a review of a book told to a friend.

A low-quality review will not be a worthy response to the book, and therefore critics should be aware of the full responsibility for their feedback. Before you write a review of the book, it is worth considering all the criteria of a quality work, but only the last point to indicate your attitude and perception of the book.

Experienced critics can say a lot about the work from the first pages of the book, but the inexperienced will have to read the text completely. However, ideally the critic is obliged to read the text carefully and fully, so that the conclusions are as reasoned and accurate as possible. A review of a good book, a sample of which can be found in classical works, where the best minds of modern times wrote their reviews, and later editors to add them to the contents of the book.

A review is a review, which means responsibility for the spoken word. Thus, the review should take into account the maximum of criteria, and the most important is the plot, its quality, the number of characters and the role of disclosure of characters, the relevance of the subject, the uniqueness of the canvas of the work. The other criteria depend more on the genre of the work, because it is not worthwhile to review the love story with the criteria of characters or the complexity of the plot. Particular prejudice and a large number of reviews are caused by works of famous contemporaries, who position themselves as confident paper writer of quality books. As a rule, there are always two camps: opponents or admirers of similar books or authors. A striking example is Paulo Coelho or Janusz Wisniewski, as well as many contemporary authors who continue to write under the flurry of real-time criticism.